نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
استادیارگروه علوم اجتماعی، دانشکده علوم انسانی دانشگاه کاشان، کاشان، ایران
عنوان مقاله [English]
The quality and quantity of women’s participation in decisive and historic events, such as the revolutions, has not been identical. It has taken different forms depending upon the social and cultural conditions and situations. At the same time, women’s participation has brought gender type into the political conflicts and decision-making process.
The Islamic Revolution, that is the most important event determining the political and social fate of the Iranian nation, is no exception to this rule. This is because only 15 years after granting women the right to vote in the context of the reformation plan of White Revolution, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi experie nced the ire and objection of the Ulema upon redefinition of the women’s roles by his government. Massive participation of the women in revolutionary developments with an image quite different from the commonly accepted traditional or modern model of women in Iran attracted the attention of the foreign observers so that they termed it the “revolution of chadors”.
The whys and wherefores behind contribution of women in revolutionary developments are among the less attended areas in the theoretical and research studies on history of the Islamic Revolution. Therefore, this paper intends to show how gender, as a discourse construction, has managed to emerge high within two decades before the victory of Islamic Revolution in the light of linguistic capacities, power concepts and implied resistance, amidst political and social incidents and the usual determining frontiers of man/woman identity factors. To do this based on a discourse analysis method, this paper has focused on official documents produced by political elite and Iranian press in between the years 1963-1978. To that end, we will picture a historical platform in which the signified man/woman emerges gradually from thousands of years old status to find a new meaning and structure in connection with central signifiers of current rivals’ discourse amidst political clashes including official discourse of the government, traditional clericalism, religious and revolutionary intellectualism.